![]() Initial setup used by me (obviously wrong)! Problem with the signal at the other end of the That she used a pulse excitation) (in2p3_._allpl Setup proposed by Monika (with the exception Frequency range 0-50GHz (for a faster simulation).Magnetic boundary (further away from the PCB.Similar results for the case with No lumpedĮlements in2p3_._allplanes_04_nolumped_WPs) Stack-up includes all GND, signal and powerĭiscrete ports Lumped elements (power-GND) (in2p3_ Waveports with multipins (odd and even modes).very similar with the results from the discrete.Even though the renormalized results from the.Magnetic boundary (in2p3_via_design_011_allopen_WP Magnetic boundary (in2p3_via_design_011_allopen.moĭiscrete ports (2)- Electric vs. MagneticĮlectric boundary (in2p3_via_design_011.mod) ![]() Magnetic boundary (located far)ĭiscrete ports (1)- Electric vs. Include only the GND planes (analog and digital.I_CERN_Doc\IN2P3_Cachemiche\ Figs\FIG_WP_discretep Discrete portsįigures in G\Services\cdsusers\aoltean\SI_CERN\S Title: CST Microwave Studio Waveports vs' Discrete ports setup for a PCB via geometryĬST Microwave StudioWaveports vs.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |